Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER)
Punica granatum
RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS: Low risk, score: 3.5 (low risk based on second screen)
|
Australian/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Hawai‘i. Research directed by C. Daehler (UH Botany) with funding from the Kaulunani Urban Forestry Program and US Forest Service Information on
Risk Assessments |
Punica granatum; pomegranate |
Answer |
||
1.01 |
Is the species highly domesticated? |
y=-3, n=0 |
y |
1.02 |
Has the species become naturalized where grown? |
y=-1, n=-1 |
y |
1.03 |
Does the species have weedy races? |
y=-1, n=-1 |
n |
2.01 |
Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) – If island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute “wet tropical” for “tropical or subtropical” |
See Append 2 |
1 |
2.02 |
Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) see appendix 2 |
1 |
|
2.03 |
Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
2.04 |
Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
2.05 |
Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2 |
?=-1, n=0 |
y |
3.01 |
Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2), n= question 2.05 |
y |
|
3.02 |
Garden/amenity/disturbance weed y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
3.03 |
Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed y = 2*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
3.04 |
Environmental weed y = 2*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
3.05 |
Congeneric weed y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
4.01 |
Produces spines, thorns or burrs |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
4.02 |
Allelopathic |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.03 |
Parasitic |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.04 |
Unpalatable to grazing animals |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
4.05 |
Toxic to animals |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.06 |
Host for recognized pests and pathogens |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
4.07 |
Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.08 |
Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.09 |
Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle |
y=1, n=0 |
|
4.1 |
Tolerates a wide range of soil conditions (or limestone conditions if not a volcanic island) |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
4.11 |
Climbing or smothering growth habit |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.12 |
Forms dense thickets |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.01 |
Aquatic |
y=5, n=0 |
n |
5.02 |
Grass |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.03 |
Nitrogen fixing woody plant |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.04 |
Geophyte (herbaceous with underground storage organs -- bulbs, corms, or tubers) |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
6.01 |
Evidence of substantial reproductive failure in native habitat |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
6.02 |
Produces viable seed. |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
6.03 |
Hybridizes naturally |
y=1, n=-1 |
|
6.04 |
Self-compatible or apomictic |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
6.05 |
Requires specialist pollinators |
y=-1, n=0 |
n |
6.06 |
Reproduction by vegetative fragmentation |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
6.07 |
Minimum generative time (years) 1 year = 1, 2 or 3 years = 0, 4+ years = -1 |
See left |
3 |
7.01 |
Propagules likely to be dispersed unintentionally (plants growing in heavily trafficked areas) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.02 |
Propagules dispersed intentionally by people |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
7.03 |
Propagules likely to disperse as a produce contaminant |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.04 |
Propagules adapted to wind dispersal |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.05 |
Propagules water dispersed |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.06 |
Propagules bird dispersed |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
7.07 |
Propagules dispersed by other animals (externally) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.08 |
Propagules survive passage through the gut |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
8.01 |
Prolific seed production (>1000/m2) |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
8.02 |
Evidence that a persistent propagule bank is formed (>1 yr) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
8.03 |
Well controlled by herbicides |
y=-1, n=1 |
|
8.04 |
Tolerates, or benefits from, mutilation, cultivation, or fire |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
8.05 |
Effective natural enemies present locally (e.g. introduced biocontrol agents) |
y=-1, n=1 |
|
Total score: |
3.5 |
Supporting data:
Source |
Notes |
|
1.01 |
(1)CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. (2)http://www.tau.ac.il/lifesci/botany/judaism.htm |
(1)There are numerous cultivars which have been selected for their medicinal, fruit and ornamental qualities. (2)domesticated in the "Fertile Crescent", presently the area stretching from Iraq, through Turkey-Syria-Lebanon, Israel to Egypt. these crops have thus been cultivated since ancient times. e.g. A group of three pomegranates (Punica granatum Linnaeus), in the mosaic floor of the ancient synagogue of Heftsibah-Bet Alfa, dated from the 6th century BC. |
1.02 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
It has naturalized in the Mediterranean region. |
1.03 |
no evidence |
|
2.01 |
USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. |
(1) Distributional range: [MEDITERRANEAN] |
2.02 |
||
2.03 |
(1) Horticopia A-Z.Horticopia, Inc., Purcellville, VA. ISBN 1-887215-07-7. (2) CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
Natural latitude range: Approximate limits north to south:
40N to 26N Hardiness Range 7B to 10A |
2.04 |
USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. |
Distributional range: [MEDITERRANEAN] |
2.05 |
USDA, NRCS. 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. |
USA: Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Puerto Rico, Utah, Virgin Islands |
3.01 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
It has naturalized in the Mediterranean region. |
3.02 |
no evidence |
|
3.03 |
no evidence |
|
3.04 |
no evidence |
|
3.05 |
no evidence |
|
4.01 |
Whistler, A.W. (2000) Tropical Oramentals: a Guide. Timber Press, Inc., Portland, Oregon. 542pp. p.389 |
"often spiny stems" |
4.02 |
no evidence |
|
4.03 |
no evidence |
|
4.04 |
USDA, NRCS. 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. |
Palatable Browse Animal: Low |
4.05 |
no evidence |
|
4.06 |
Kanmiya, K.; Sonobe, R. (2002) Records of two citrus pest whiteflies in Japan with special reference to their mating sounds (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology, 2002, Vol.37, No.3, pp.487-495, 18 ref. |
AB: A serious citrus pest, the ash whitefly, Siphoninus phillyreae , was first recorded in Honshu and Kyushu, Japan. The favoured host plant is pomegranate (Punica granatum ) from early summer to autumn. The adults migrate to a hedge plant (Photinia glabra ) or rarely to a citrus plant (Citrus natsudaidai ) before pomegranates shed their leaves in winter. Another citrus pest, the woolly whitefly, Aleurothrixus floccosus , was found from Nansei Islands to north of Tokunoshima Island, Japan. The distribution of these two pests and diagnostic features were detailed. Substrate-borne vibratory sounds produced during mating were elucidated, including new findings of male and female communication by reciprocal sound signals. It is suggested that the species-specific bioacoustic signals preserve useful information for the whitefly biosystematics of economic importance. |
4.07 |
no evidence |
|
4.08 |
http://www.ci.arcadia.ca.us/files/Fire/SafePlantFireRating.pdf |
low flammability rating |
4.09 |
(1) USDA, NRCS. 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5
(http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA
70874-4490 USA. |
(1) Shade Tolerance: Intermediate |
4.1 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
- Soil texture: light; medium; heavy |
4.11 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
a deciduous shrub or small, bushy tree |
4.12 |
no evidence |
|
5.01 |
terrestrial |
|
5.02 |
tree; Puniaceae |
|
5.03 |
USDA, NRCS. 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. |
Nitrogen Fixation: None |
5.04 |
tree |
|
6.01 |
no evidence |
|
6.02 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. (2)http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/lppi/htm/sp310.htm |
It can be propagated by cuttings, air-layering, seeds and
seedlings. (2)Primary method of propagation: cutting |
6.03 |
http://www.aaronscanna-amaryllis.com/pomegranate/index.shtml |
no evidence 'New hybrids are now available to be grown in the U.S., and now growing pomegranates by home owners is possible in areas other than the deep south, where growing was previously restricted.' [No evidence that hybridization occurs naturally]. |
6.04 |
(1)Pollination and fruit set studies in pomegranate. |
(1) "Fruit set was 79% and 43.3% for intact open and self-pollinated flowers or 26.4% and 66.2% for the same after emasculation. The pomegranate, which is normally thought of as a cross-pollinated crop, is capable of both open and self-pollination. " (2) The pomegranate is self-pollinated as well as cross-pollinated by insects. |
6.05 |
(1)http://gears.tucson.ars.ag.gov/book/chap5/pom.html (2)http://www.crfg.org/pubs/ff/pomegranate.html |
(1) 'Pollination Requirements: Little is known about the
pollination of pomegranates. Knuth (1908*, p. 440) stated that beetles
belonging to the genera Cetonia and Trichodes effect both cross- as well as
self-pollination, while devouring the flowers. The ability of the plant to
self-pollinate or its need for transfer of pollen either within its own
flower, between flowers, or between plants is unknown. Kihara (1958)
reported the discovery of a "seedless" pomegranate in which the pollen was
sterile but the fruit developed. It had only half (307) of the normal number
of developed embryos. These were not viable seeds; however, the size of the
fruit was normal. |
6.06 |
USDA, NRCS. 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5 (http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA. |
Vegetative Spread Rate: None |
6.07 |
(1)Horticopia A-Z.Horticopia, Inc., Purcellville, VA. ISBN 1-887215-07-7. (2)http://www.crfg.org/pubs/ff/pomegranate.html |
(1)Fruits begin forming about 4 years after planting (2) The pomegranate may begin to bear in 1 year after planting out, but 2-1/2 to 3 years is more common. Under suitable conditions the fruit should mature some 5 to 7 months after bloom. |
7.01 |
no evidence |
|
7.02 |
widely cultivated in many countries of the world for its fruit |
|
7.03 |
no evidence |
|
7.04 |
no evidence |
|
7.05 |
no evidence |
|
7.06 |
Whistler, A.W. (2000) Tropical Oramentals: a Guide. Timber Press, Inc., Portland, Oregon. 542pp. p.389 |
Fruit a red globose berry 5-13 cm in diameter with many seeds embaded in a red jelly |
7.07 |
no evidence |
|
7.08 |
http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/faculty/webb/BOT201/Dispersal/BOT311-00/anthogymnolcycle4.htm |
bird-dispersed |
8.01 |
(1) USDA, NRCS. 2002. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5
(http://plants.usda.gov). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA
70874-4490 USA. |
(1) Seed per Pound: 2400 [numberous seeds in each fruit] |
8.02 |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
Stand establishment using direct sowing [no indication of dormancy] |
8.03 |
no evidence |
|
8.04 |
http://www.crfg.org/pubs/ff/pomegranate.html |
There is a strong tendency to sucker from the base. [implies regrowth after cutting to base] |
8.05 |
no evidence |
Need more info? Have questions? Comments? Information to contribute? Contact PIER!
[ Return to PIER homepage ] [Risk assessment page]
This page updated 3 November 2005