Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk (PIER)
Eucalyptus paniculata
RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS: High risk, score: 11
|
Australian/New Zealand Weed Risk Assessment adapted for Hawai‘i. Research directed by C. Daehler (UH Botany) with funding from the Kaulunani Urban Forestry Program and US Forest Service Information on
Risk Assessments |
Eucalyptus paniculata Sm.; grey ironbark |
Answer |
||
1.01 |
Is the species highly domesticated? |
y=-3, n=0 |
n |
1.02 |
Has the species become naturalized where grown? |
y=-1, n=-1 |
y |
1.03 |
Does the species have weedy races? |
y=-1, n=-1 |
n |
2.01 |
Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) – If island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute “wet tropical” for “tropical or subtropical” |
See Append 2 |
2 |
2.02 |
Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) see appendix 2 |
2 |
|
2.03 |
Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
2.04 |
Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or subtropical climates |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
2.05 |
Does the species have a history of repeated introductions outside its natural range? y=-2 |
?=-1, n=0 |
y |
3.01 |
Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2), n= question 2.05 |
y |
|
3.02 |
Garden/amenity/disturbance weed y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
3.03 |
Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed y = 2*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
n |
3.04 |
Environmental weed y = 2*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
y |
3.05 |
Congeneric weed y = 1*multiplier (see Append 2) |
n=0 |
y |
4.01 |
Produces spines, thorns or burrs |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.02 |
Allelopathic |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.03 |
Parasitic |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.04 |
Unpalatable to grazing animals |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
4.05 |
Toxic to animals |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.06 |
Host for recognized pests and pathogens |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
4.07 |
Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.08 |
Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
4.09 |
Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.1 |
Tolerates a wide range of soil conditions (or limestone conditions if not a volcanic island) |
y=1, n=0 |
y |
4.11 |
Climbing or smothering growth habit |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
4.12 |
Forms dense thickets |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.01 |
Aquatic |
y=5, n=0 |
n |
5.02 |
Grass |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.03 |
Nitrogen fixing woody plant |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
5.04 |
Geophyte (herbaceous with underground storage organs -- bulbs, corms, or tubers) |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
6.01 |
Evidence of substantial reproductive failure in native habitat |
y=1, n=0 |
n |
6.02 |
Produces viable seed. |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
6.03 |
Hybridizes naturally |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
6.04 |
Self-compatible or apomictic |
y=1, n=-1 |
|
6.05 |
Requires specialist pollinators |
y=-1, n=0 |
n |
6.06 |
Reproduction by vegetative fragmentation |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
6.07 |
Minimum generative time (years) 1 year = 1, 2 or 3 years = 0, 4+ years = -1 |
See left |
4 |
7.01 |
Propagules likely to be dispersed unintentionally (plants growing in heavily trafficked areas) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.02 |
Propagules dispersed intentionally by people |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
7.03 |
Propagules likely to disperse as a produce contaminant |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.04 |
Propagules adapted to wind dispersal |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
7.05 |
Propagules water dispersed |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.06 |
Propagules bird dispersed |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.07 |
Propagules dispersed by other animals (externally) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
7.08 |
Propagules survive passage through the gut |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
8.01 |
Prolific seed production (>1000/m2) |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
8.02 |
Evidence that a persistent propagule bank is formed (>1 yr) |
y=1, n=-1 |
n |
8.03 |
Well controlled by herbicides |
y=-1, n=1 |
|
8.04 |
Tolerates, or benefits from, mutilation, cultivation, or fire |
y=1, n=-1 |
y |
8.05 |
Effective natural enemies present locally (e.g. introduced biocontrol agents) |
y=-1, n=1 |
|
Total score: |
11 |
Supporting data:
Notes |
Source |
|
1.01 |
no evidence |
|
1.02 |
category 2 invader in South Africa [proven plant invaders under uncontrolled conditions outside demarcated areas] |
http://www.gov.za/gazette/notices/1999/2485.htm |
1.03 |
no evidence |
|
2.01 |
E. paniculata is a species of subtropical warm humid to
sub-humid climates. |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
2.02 |
||
2.03 |
(1) Climate descriptors |
(1)CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. (2)http://ecocrop.fao.org/ |
2.04 |
E. paniculata is a species of subtropical warm humid to
sub-humid climates. |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
2.05 |
List of countries where planted |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
3.01 |
category 2 invader in South Africa [proven plant invaders under uncontrolled conditions outside demarcated areas] |
http://www.gov.za/gazette/notices/1999/2485.htm |
3.02 |
no evidence |
|
3.03 |
no evidence |
|
3.04 |
category 2 invader in South Africa [proven plant invaders under uncontrolled conditions outside demarcated areas] |
http://www.gov.za/gazette/notices/1999/2485.htm |
3.05 |
Bacon, P. (Project coordinator) (1997) An electronic atlas of weeds and invasive species.Version 1.0 May 1997. (Based on the original work "Holm, L.; J.V. Puncho; J.P. Herberger & D.L. Plucknett (1979) A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. John Wiley & Sons, Inc." ) |
E. campageana, E. ferruginea, E. gracilis, E. marginata, E. miniata, e. pilularis, E. populnea, and E. tetradonta were listed as principal weeds in Australia (native habitat) |
4.01 |
no description of these traits |
Penfold, A. R. & J.L. Willis (1961) The eucalypts: botany, cultivation, chemistry, and utilization. Interscience Publishers , London, L. Hill; New York 1961. 551 pp. p.444 |
4.02 |
no evidence |
|
4.03 |
no evidence |
|
4.04 |
Chemical properties of Eucalyptus deter grazing |
http://www.ganesha.co.uk/Articles/Eucalyptus.htm |
4.05 |
no evidence |
|
4.06 |
Fungi associated with Eucalyptus paniculata |
Farr, D.F., Rossman, A.Y., Palm, M.E., & McCray, E.B. (n.d.) Fungal Databases, Systematic Botany & Mycology Laboratory, ARS, USDA. Retrieved March 10, 2004, from http://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/ |
4.07 |
Pests recorded |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
4.08 |
eucalypt soils contained 27 tons of litter per hectare compared to only 12 tons produced by the native forest [sheds significant litter] |
http://bioenergy.ornl.gov/reports/euc-braz/eucal2a.html |
4.09 |
(1) open, sunny position. (2)full sun |
(1)http://www.warringah.nsw.gov.au/tree_replacement_large.htm (2)http://ecocrop.fao.org/ |
4.1 |
(1) "with adaptability to a wide range of soil conditions" |
(1) CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global
Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
4.11 |
"Eucalyptus paniculata is a medium-sized to tall tree, 15-30 m high and with a diameter at breast height (dbh) up to 1 m. On favourable sites, heights of up to 50 m and dbhs of 1.5 m have been recorded." |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
4.12 |
no evidence |
|
5.01 |
"Thrives on good sandy loams, particularly in moist valleys, but avoid poor sands." |
Penfold, A. R. & J.L. Willis (1961) The eucalypts: botany, cultivation, chemistry, and utilization. Interscience Publishers , London, L. Hill; New York 1961. 551 pp. p.444 |
5.02 |
tree; Myrtaceae |
|
5.03 |
no evidence |
|
5.04 |
tree |
|
6.01 |
no evidence |
|
6.02 |
Propagation by Seed |
http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/lppi/htm/sp136.htm |
6.03 |
E. hybrida Maiden is a hybrid between E. hemiphloia and E. paniculata |
Penfold, A. R. & J.L. Willis (1961) The eucalypts: botany, cultivation, chemistry, and utilization. Interscience Publishers , London, L. Hill; New York 1961. 551 pp. p.432 |
6.04 |
no evidence |
|
6.05 |
(1) "produces good honey" [visited by bees] |
(1) CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global
Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
6.06 |
no evidence |
|
6.07 |
(1)growth rate medium (2)Grey Ironbark is a hard dense wood [minimum for a medium growth rate large tree] |
(1)http://www.fncw.nsw.gov.au/camphor_kit/6a_Paddock_trees.xls (2)http://www.woodbook.co.uk/I%20-L.htm |
7.01 |
no evidence |
|
7.02 |
List of countries where planted |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. (2)http://www.batcon.org/discover/ffecon4.html |
7.03 |
no evidence |
|
7.04 |
Approximate viable seed per gram 180. [small wedged shaped seeds] |
http://www.nzseeds.co.nz/seed_list/Eucalyptus_paniculata.html |
7.05 |
no evidence |
|
7.06 |
dry fruit |
|
7.07 |
no evidence |
|
7.08 |
no evidence of ingestion |
|
8.01 |
Approximate viable seed per gram 180. [small seeds] |
http://www.nzseeds.co.nz/seed_list/Eucalyptus_paniculata.html |
8.02 |
About 95% of Eucalyptus seed needs no pre-treatment [lacks natural dormancy in soil] |
http://www.australiaplants.com/eucalyptus_seed_germination.htm |
8.03 |
no evidence |
|
8.04 |
"good coppicing ability" |
CAB International, (2000) Forestry Compendium Global Module. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. |
8.05 |
no evidence |
Need more info? Have questions? Comments? Information to contribute? Contact PIER!
[ Return to PIER homepage ] [Risk assessment page]
This page new 4 September 2005